VigiPallia : Résultats

RELATION MEDECIN PATIENT

0 sélectionnée(s) / 691 réponse(s)

(1) 2 3 4 ... 35 > »

Conversations on cancer chemotherapy cessation in patients with advanced cancer - qualitative findings from a multi-institutional study

STOUT, Jeremiah ; KUMBAMU, Ashok ; TILBURT, Jon ; FERNANDEZ, Cara ; GELLER, Gail ; KOENIG, Barbara A. ; LENZ, Heinz-Josep ; JATOI, Aminah
American journal of hospice and palliative medicine, 04/06/2020, Pagination inconnue

Document en ligne

Increasing advance care planning in the secondary care setting - a quality improvement project

STEEL, Anna ; BERTFIELD, Deborah
Future healthcare journal, 06/2020, vol.7, n°2, p. 137-142

Document en ligne

A bitter elixir - palliative chemotherapy during a pandemic

JACKSON, Amie E.
Journal of clinical oncology, 28/05/2020, p. 1-2

Document en ligne

The 6-star doctor? - physicians’ communication of poor prognosis to patients and their families in Cape Coast, Ghana

CAULFIELD, Alexandra ; PLYMOTH, Amelie ; NARTEY, Yvonne Ayerki ; MOLSTED-ALVESSON, Helle
BMJ global health, 06/2020, vol.5, n°6, p. 1-10

Document en ligne

Attitude and barriers in palliative care and advance care planning in nonmalignant chronic lung disease - results from a Danish national survey

SORENSEN, Anita Rath ; MARSAA, Kristoffer ; PRIOR, Thomas Skovhus ; BENDSTRUP, Elisabeth
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 23/06/2020, Pagination inconnue

Document en ligne

Mieux communiquer pour mieux soigner - concepts et outils à l'usage des professionnels de la santé

GAUME, Jean-Pierre
Graine d'Auteur , 06/2020 , 360 p.

Emotional communication in advanced pediatric cancer conversations

SISK, Bryan A. ; FRIEDRICH, Annie B. ; DUBOIS, James ; MACK, Jennifer W.
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 04/2020, vol.59, n°4, p. 808-817

Document en ligne

L'entretien, un acte thérapeutique - champs médical, psychologique et psychosocial

THOMAS, François
Seli Arslan , 05/2020 , 182 p.

Evaluation of a communication skills training to facilitate addressing palliative care related topics in advanced cancer patients - study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PALLI-KOM)

HARNISCHFEGER, Nele ; RATH, Hilke M. ; ULLRICH, Anneke ; ALT-EPPING, Bernd ; LETSCH, Anne ; THUSS-PATIENCE, Peter ; BOKEMEYER, Carsten ; OECHSLE, Karin ; BERGELT, Corinna
BMC palliative care, 12/05/2020, vol.19, n°1, p. 1-8

Document en ligne

Decisional control preferences in the Hispanic population in the Bronx

CARDENAS, Jhosselini ; INFANTE, Pamela ; INFANTE, Abel ; CHUANG, Elizabeth ; SELWYN, Peter
Journal of cancer education, 01/01/2019, vol.34, n°3, p. 472-477

Document en ligne

Effects of a communication intervention randomized controlled trial to enable goals-of-care discussions

BICKELL, Nina A. ; BACK, Anthony L. ; ADELSON, Kerin ; GONSKY, Jason P. ; EGOROVA, Natalia ; PINTOVA, Sofya ; LIN, Jenny J. ; KOZUCH, Peter ; BAGIELLA, Emilia ; SMITH, Cardinale B.
JCO oncology practice, 06/05/2020, Pagination inconnue

Document en ligne

Realizing better doctor-patient dialogue about choices in palliative care and early phase clinical trial participation - towards an online value clarification tool (OnVaCT)

VAN LENT, Liza G. G. ; STOEL, Nicole K. ; VAN WEERT, Julia C. M. ; VAN GURP, Jelle ; DE JONGE, Maja J. A. ; LOLKEMA, Martijn P. ; GORT, Eelke H. ; PULLEMAN, Saskia M. ; OOMEN-DE HOOP, Esther ; HASSELAAR, Jeroen ; VAN DER RIJT, Carin C. D.
BMC palliative care, 29/11/2019, vol.18, n°1, p. 1-10

Document en ligne

Present at bedside at time of death

LYCETTE, Jennifer L.
Journal of clinical oncology, 30/04/2020, p. 1-4

Document en ligne

End-of-life communication in advanced cancer - international trends (2009-2014)

VERKISSEN, Mariëtte N. ; PENDERS, Yolanda W. H. ; ONWUTEAKA-PHILIPSEN, Bregje D. ; MOREELS, Sarah ; DONKER, Gé A. ; VEGA ALONSO, Tomás ; VAN DEN BLOCK, Lieve ; DELIENS, Luc
BMJ supportive and palliative care, 27/04/2020, Pagination inconnue

Document en ligne

The effect of prognostic communication on patient outcomes in palliative cancer care - a systematic review

VAN DER VELDEN, Naomi C. A. ; MEIJERS, Maartje C. ; HAN, Paul K. J. ; VAN LAARHOVEN, Hanneke W. M. ; SMETS, Ellen M. A. ; HENSELMANS, Inge
Current treatment options in oncology, 23/04/2020, vol.21, n°5, p. 1-38

Document en ligne

Physicians’ end of life discussions with patients - is there an ethical obligation to discuss aid in dying?

ZHOU, Yan Ming Jane ; SHELTON, Wayne
HEC forum, 27/03/2020, Pagination inconnue

Document en ligne

Thème : Soins.

RELATION MEDECIN PATIENT ; FIN VIE ; ETHIQUE MEDICALE ; SUICIDE MEDICALEMENT ASSISTE ; COMMUNICATION

Since Oregon implemented its Death with Dignity Act, many additional states have followed suit demonstrating a growing understanding and acceptance of aid in dying (AID) processes. Traditionally, the patient has been the one to request and seek this option out. However, as Death with Dignity acts continue to expand, it will impact the role of physicians and bring up questions over whether physicians have the ethical obligation to facilitate a conversation about AID with patients during end of life discussions. Patients have the right to make informed decisions about their health, which implies that physicians have an obligation to discuss with and inform patients of the options that will accomplish the patients’ goals of care. We will argue that physicians have an ethical obligation to inform certain patients about AID (in qualifying states) during end of life care discussions. We will also address what this obligation encompasses and explore guidelines of when and how these conversations should occur and proceed. Earlier guidelines, presented by various palliative care and ethics experts, for proceeding with such conversations have mostly agreed that the discussion of hospice and end of life care with patients should be initiated early and that the individual goals of a patient during the remaining duration of life should be thoroughly examined before discussion of appropriate options. In discussing AID, physicians should never recommend but inform patients about the basics so that they can make an informed decision. If patients express further interest in AID, the physician should open up the dialogue to address the reasoning behind this decision versus other possible treatments to ensure that patients clearly comprehend the process and implications of their decision. Ultimately, any end of life choice should be made by patients with the full capacity to express what they envision for the remaining duration of life and to comprehend the advantages and disadvantages of all the possible options.

Origine : DOI.org (Crossref

General practitioners’ perceptions on the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a risk prediction checklist to support their end-of-life discussions in routine care - a qualitative study

LEWIS, Ebony T ; MAHIMBO, Abela ; LINHART, Christine ; WILLIAMSON, Margaret ; MORGAN, Mark ; HAMMILL, Kathrine ; HALL, John ; CARDONA, Magnolia
Family practice, 16/04/2020, Pagination inconnue

Document en ligne

Advance care planning in cancer - patient preferences for personnel and timing

KUBI, Boateng ; ISTL, Alexandra C. ; LEE, Kimberley T. ; CONCA-CHENG, Alison ; JOHNSTON, Fabian M.
JCO oncology practice, 13/04/2020, Pagination inconnue

Document en ligne

Estimating the impact of words used by physicians in advance care planning discussions - the "do you want everything done?" effect

DIDIODATO, Giulio
Critical care explorations, 10/2019, vol.1, n°10, p. 1-6

Document en ligne

Frequency of discussing and documenting advance care planning in primary care - secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional observational study

HAMANO, Jun ; OISHI, Ai ; MORITA, Tatsuya ; KIZAWA, Yoshiyuki
BMC palliative care, 17/03/2020, vol.19, n°1, p. 1-8

Document en ligne

Thème : Soins. Cote : eD02.04.01

PROJET SOIN ANTICIPE ; COMMUNICATION ; RELATION MEDECIN PATIENT ; DOSSIER PATIENT

Background: To improve the quality of advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, it is important to understand the frequency of and topics involved in the ACP discussion between patients and their family physicians (FPs).
Methods: A secondary analysis of a previous multicenter cross-sectional observational study was performed. The primary outcome of this analysis was the frequency of and topics involved in the ACP discussion between outpatients and FPs. In March 2017, 22 family physicians at 17 clinics scheduled a day to assess outpatients and enrolled patients older than 65 years who were recognized by FPs as having regular visits. We defined three ACP discussion topics: 1) future decline in activities of daily living (ADL), 2) future inability to eat, and 3) surrogate decision makers. FPs assessed whether they had ever discussed any ACP topics with each patient and their family members, and if they had documented the results of these discussions in medical records before patients were enrolled in the present study. We defined patients as being at risk of deteriorating and dying if they had at least 2 positive general indicators or at least 1 positive disease-specific indicator in the Japanese version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool.
Results: In total, 382 patients with a mean age of 77.4 ± 7.9 years were enrolled, and 63.1% were female. Seventy-nine patients (20.7%) had discussed at least one ACP topic with their FPs. However, only 23 patients (6.0%) had discussed an ACP topic with family members and their FPs, with the results being documented in their medical records. The topic of future ADL decline was discussed and documented more often than the other two topics. Patients at risk of deteriorating and dying discussed ACP topics significantly more often than those not at risk of deteriorating and dying (39.4% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: FPs may discuss ACP with some of their patients, but may not often document the results of this discussion in medical records. FPs need to be encouraged to discuss ACP with patients and family members and describe the decisions reached in medical records.

Origine : PubMed

(1) 2 3 4 ... 35 > »

Actions

##titre_notice##